mono/skiasharp vs mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse
mono/skiasharp shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, skiasharp shows healthier maintenance signals than wavefunctioncollapse. skiasharp rates Healthy overall while wavefunctioncollapse rates Mixed. skiasharp last saw a commit 1 month ago with 7+ active contributors, while wavefunctioncollapse last saw a commit 3 months ago with 14+ active contributors. skiasharp is MIT-licensed while wavefunctioncollapse is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
mono/skiasharp →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 77% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| skiasharp | wavefunctioncollapse | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,386 | 25,036 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 3mo ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 783 | 8 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? mono/skiasharp · mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse
Ask AI about mono/skiasharp vs mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.