mono/skiasharp vs nilaoda/n_m3u8dl-cli
mono/skiasharp shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, skiasharp shows healthier maintenance signals than n_m3u8dl-cli. skiasharp rates Healthy overall while n_m3u8dl-cli rates Mixed. skiasharp was committed to 2 weeks ago with 5+ active contributors, while n_m3u8dl-cli last saw a commit 3 years ago with 8+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
mono/skiasharp
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
nilaoda/n_m3u8dl-cli
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; top contributor handles 92% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| skiasharp | n_m3u8dl-cli | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,561 | 16,064 |
| Last commit | 16d ago | 3y ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 865 | 259 |
| Has tests | ✓ | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 63% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? mono/skiasharp · nilaoda/n_m3u8dl-cli
Ask AI about mono/skiasharp vs nilaoda/n_m3u8dl-cli
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.