RepoPilot

moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt vs qbittorrent/qbittorrent

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, moonlight-qt and qbittorrent both show mixed maintenance signals. moonlight-qt last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors, while qbittorrent was committed to 3 weeks ago with 24+ active contributors. moonlight-qt is GPL-3.0-licensed while qbittorrent is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits…

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 8 active contributors
  • GPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

qbittorrent/qbittorrent

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other); no tests detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • No test directory detected
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 3d ago
  • 24+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 25% of recent commits)
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

moonlight-qtqbittorrent
Stars17,05037,971
Last commit1mo ago25d ago
LicenseGPL-3.0Other
Open issues5242,624
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeC
Cycles0
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt · qbittorrent/qbittorrent

Ask AI about moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt vs qbittorrent/qbittorrent

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.