moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt vs ssloy/tinyrenderer
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, moonlight-qt and tinyrenderer both show mixed maintenance signals. moonlight-qt last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors, while tinyrenderer last saw a commit 7 months ago with 8+ active contributors. moonlight-qt is GPL-3.0-licensed while tinyrenderer is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ssloy/tinyrenderer →
Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
non-standard license (Other); top contributor handles 90% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 6mo ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| moonlight-qt | tinyrenderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 17,050 | 23,510 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 7mo ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 524 | 4 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt · ssloy/tinyrenderer
Ask AI about moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt vs ssloy/tinyrenderer
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.