mui/material-ui vs shadcn-ui/ui
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
mui/material-ui →
Healthy across the board
weakest axisPermissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 22% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ⚠No test directory detected
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
shadcn-ui/ui →
Healthy across the board
weakest axisPermissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 65% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| material-ui | ui | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 98,283 | 113,620 |
| Last commit | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 1,537 | 1,847 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? mui/material-ui · shadcn-ui/ui