mularahul/keyviz vs openclaw/openclaw
openclaw/openclaw shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, openclaw shows healthier maintenance signals than keyviz. openclaw rates Healthy overall while keyviz rates Mixed. keyviz last saw a commit 2 months ago with 2+ active contributors, while openclaw was committed to 2 days ago with 22+ active contributors. keyviz is GPL-3.0-licensed while openclaw is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
mularahul/keyviz →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 97% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 6w ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
openclaw/openclaw →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 24% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| keyviz | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9,248 | 380,328 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 2d ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 52 | 6,610 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? mularahul/keyviz · openclaw/openclaw
Ask AI about mularahul/keyviz vs openclaw/openclaw
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.