mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse vs nuke-build/nuke
nuke-build/nuke shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, nuke shows healthier maintenance signals than wavefunctioncollapse. nuke rates Healthy overall while wavefunctioncollapse rates Mixed. wavefunctioncollapse last saw a commit 3 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while nuke last saw a commit 6 months ago with 6+ active contributors. wavefunctioncollapse is Other-licensed while nuke is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
nuke-build/nuke →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| wavefunctioncollapse | nuke | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,036 | 3,728 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 6mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 8 | 120 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse · nuke-build/nuke
Ask AI about mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse vs nuke-build/nuke
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.