mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse vs odysseusyuan/lky_officetools
mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, wavefunctioncollapse shows stronger maintenance signals than lky_officetools. wavefunctioncollapse rates Mixed overall while lky_officetools rates Concerns. wavefunctioncollapse last saw a commit 3 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while lky_officetools last saw a commit 2 years ago with 1+ active contributor. wavefunctioncollapse is Other-licensed while lky_officetools is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
odysseusyuan/lky_officetools →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 2y ago…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs); 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| wavefunctioncollapse | lky_officetools | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,036 | 11,799 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 8 | 2 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse · odysseusyuan/lky_officetools
Ask AI about mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse vs odysseusyuan/lky_officetools
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.