mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse vs thangchung/clean-code-dotnet
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, wavefunctioncollapse and clean-code-dotnet both show mixed maintenance signals. wavefunctioncollapse last saw a commit 3 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while clean-code-dotnet last saw a commit 4 months ago with 12+ active contributors. wavefunctioncollapse is Other-licensed while clean-code-dotnet is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
thangchung/clean-code-dotnet →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| wavefunctioncollapse | clean-code-dotnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,036 | 7,667 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 4mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 8 | 46 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse · thangchung/clean-code-dotnet
Ask AI about mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse vs thangchung/clean-code-dotnet
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.