mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse vs wave-harmonic/crest
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, wavefunctioncollapse and crest both show mixed maintenance signals. wavefunctioncollapse last saw a commit 3 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while crest last saw a commit 1 month ago with 1+ active contributor. wavefunctioncollapse is Other-licensed while crest is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
wave-harmonic/crest →
Solo project — review before adopting
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 4d ago
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| wavefunctioncollapse | crest | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,036 | 3,824 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 8 | 84 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 42% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse · wave-harmonic/crest
Ask AI about mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse vs wave-harmonic/crest
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.