RepoPilot

n8n-io/n8n vs ruvnet/ruflo

ruvnet/ruflo shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, ruflo shows healthier maintenance signals than n8n. ruflo rates Healthy overall while n8n rates Mixed. n8n was committed to 3 weeks ago with 48+ active contributors, while ruflo was committed to 1 day ago with 4+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

n8n-io/n8n

Mixed

Evidence incomplete — review before adopting

MixedDependency

license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable

MixedFork & modify

license evidence incomplete

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete…

  • Could not verify license from the available repository evidence
  • Last commit today
  • 48+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 7% of recent commits)
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

ruvnet/ruflo

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 4 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

n8nruflo
Stars202,32572,345
Last commit21d ago1d ago
LicenseUnknownMIT
Open issues1,0771,000
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage85%33%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeA
Cycles0
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? n8n-io/n8n · ruvnet/ruflo

Ask AI about n8n-io/n8n vs ruvnet/ruflo

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.