nalexn/clean-architecture-swiftui vs reactivex/rxswift
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, clean-architecture-swiftui and rxswift both show healthy maintenance signals. clean-architecture-swiftui last saw a commit 11 months ago with 11+ active contributors, while rxswift last saw a commit 2 months ago with 45+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nalexn/clean-architecture-swiftui →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 78% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 10mo ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
reactivex/rxswift →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓45+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| clean-architecture-swiftui | rxswift | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,536 | 24,644 |
| Last commit | 11mo ago | 2mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 20 | 10 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? nalexn/clean-architecture-swiftui · reactivex/rxswift
Ask AI about nalexn/clean-architecture-swiftui vs reactivex/rxswift
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.