naman14/timber vs scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, timber and smartrefreshlayout both show mixed maintenance signals. timber last saw a commit 3 years ago with 7+ active contributors, while smartrefreshlayout last saw a commit 1 year ago with 8+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
naman14/timber
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; test evidence incomplete…
test evidence incomplete; last commit was 3y ago…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; license evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 59% of recent commits
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; CI evidence incomplete…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; CI evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 52% of recent commits
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| timber | smartrefreshlayout | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 7,050 | 25,159 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 1y ago |
| License | Unknown | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 213 | 341 |
| Has tests | Unknown | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | Unknown |
| Test coverage | 0% | 72% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? naman14/timber · scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Ask AI about naman14/timber vs scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.