nhn/tui.calendar vs siyuan-note/siyuan
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, tui.calendar and siyuan both show mixed maintenance signals. tui.calendar last saw a commit 1 year ago with 7+ active contributors, while siyuan last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. tui.calendar is MIT-licensed while siyuan is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nhn/tui.calendar →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 43% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
siyuan-note/siyuan →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| tui.calendar | siyuan | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12,639 | 43,729 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 208 | 339 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 2% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? nhn/tui.calendar · siyuan-note/siyuan
Ask AI about nhn/tui.calendar vs siyuan-note/siyuan
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.