nickemanarin/screentogif vs nuke-build/nuke
nuke-build/nuke shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, nuke shows healthier maintenance signals than screentogif. nuke rates Healthy overall while screentogif rates Mixed. screentogif last saw a commit 2 months ago with 13+ active contributors, while nuke last saw a commit 6 months ago with 6+ active contributors. screentogif is MS-PL-licensed while nuke is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nickemanarin/screentogif →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (MS-PL)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (MS-PL) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MS-PL licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
nuke-build/nuke →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| screentogif | nuke | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 26,910 | 3,728 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 6mo ago |
| License | MS-PL | MIT |
| Open issues | 320 | 120 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? nickemanarin/screentogif · nuke-build/nuke
Ask AI about nickemanarin/screentogif vs nuke-build/nuke
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.