RepoPilot

nickemanarin/screentogif vs raywangqvq/bilibilitoolpro

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, screentogif and bilibilitoolpro both show mixed maintenance signals. screentogif last saw a commit 2 months ago with 13+ active contributors, while bilibilitoolpro last saw a commit 1 month ago with 2+ active contributors. screentogif is MS-PL-licensed while bilibilitoolpro is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

nickemanarin/screentogif

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (MS-PL)

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
  • Non-standard license (MS-PL) — review terms
  • Last commit 2w ago
  • 13 active contributors
  • MS-PL licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

raywangqvq/bilibilitoolpro

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 99% of recent commits

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 2 active contributors
  • GPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

screentogifbilibilitoolpro
Stars26,9108,576
Last commit2mo ago1mo ago
LicenseMS-PLGPL-3.0
Open issues320138
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%1%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? nickemanarin/screentogif · raywangqvq/bilibilitoolpro

Ask AI about nickemanarin/screentogif vs raywangqvq/bilibilitoolpro

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.