nickemanarin/screentogif vs shadowsocksr-backup/shadowsocksr-csharp
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, screentogif and shadowsocksr-csharp both show mixed maintenance signals. screentogif last saw a commit 2 months ago with 13+ active contributors, while shadowsocksr-csharp last saw a commit 7 years ago with 2+ active contributors. screentogif is MS-PL-licensed while shadowsocksr-csharp is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nickemanarin/screentogif →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (MS-PL)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (MS-PL) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MS-PL licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
shadowsocksr-backup/shadowsocksr-csharp →
Stale — last commit 7y ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 7y ago…
no CI workflows detected; no description (proxy for README missing)…
no description (proxy for README missing); last commit was 7y ago
last commit was 7y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 7y ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: wire up GitHub Actions or equivalent
- →Learn from Mixed → Healthy if: add a README + repo description
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| screentogif | shadowsocksr-csharp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 26,910 | 4,511 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 7y ago |
| License | MS-PL | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 320 | 10 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 4% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? nickemanarin/screentogif · shadowsocksr-backup/shadowsocksr-csharp
Ask AI about nickemanarin/screentogif vs shadowsocksr-backup/shadowsocksr-csharp
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.