nikitabobko/aerospace vs quoid/userscripts
nikitabobko/aerospace shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, aerospace shows healthier maintenance signals than userscripts. aerospace rates Healthy overall while userscripts rates Mixed. aerospace last saw a commit 2 months ago with 8+ active contributors, while userscripts last saw a commit 1 month ago with 2+ active contributors. aerospace is MIT-licensed while userscripts is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nikitabobko/aerospace →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
quoid/userscripts →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 97% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| aerospace | userscripts | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 20,687 | 4,492 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 204 | 63 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 8% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? nikitabobko/aerospace · quoid/userscripts
Ask AI about nikitabobko/aerospace vs quoid/userscripts
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.