nikitabobko/aerospace vs zixun/godeye
nikitabobko/aerospace shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, aerospace shows healthier maintenance signals than godeye. aerospace rates Healthy overall while godeye rates Concerns. aerospace last saw a commit 2 months ago with 8+ active contributors, while godeye last saw a commit 1 year ago with 1+ active contributor. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nikitabobko/aerospace →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
zixun/godeye →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
last commit was 2y ago; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; onboard a second core maintainer
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| aerospace | godeye | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 20,687 | 3,878 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 204 | 10 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? nikitabobko/aerospace · zixun/godeye
Ask AI about nikitabobko/aerospace vs zixun/godeye
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.