nilbuild/developer-roadmap vs reactivex/rxjs
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of July 2026, developer-roadmap and rxjs both show mixed maintenance signals. developer-roadmap was committed to 4 days ago with 22+ active contributors, while rxjs last saw a commit 1 year ago with 18+ active contributors. developer-roadmap is Other-licensed while rxjs is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nilbuild/developer-roadmap
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 8 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 64% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: clarify license terms
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
reactivex/rxjs
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 59% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Token-Permissions" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| developer-roadmap | rxjs | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 358,870 | 31,690 |
| Last commit | 4d ago | 1y ago |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 25 | 300 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 8 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? nilbuild/developer-roadmap · reactivex/rxjs
Ask AI about nilbuild/developer-roadmap vs reactivex/rxjs
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.