nilbuild/developer-roadmap vs siyuan-note/siyuan
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, developer-roadmap and siyuan both show mixed maintenance signals. developer-roadmap was committed to 1 day ago with 26+ active contributors, while siyuan was committed to 4 days ago with 2+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nilbuild/developer-roadmap
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; license evidence incomplete
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
siyuan-note/siyuan
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 94% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| developer-roadmap | siyuan | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 367,456 | 46,320 |
| Last commit | 1d ago | 4d ago |
| License | Unknown | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 0 | 19 |
| Has tests | No | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 49% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? nilbuild/developer-roadmap · siyuan-note/siyuan
Ask AI about nilbuild/developer-roadmap vs siyuan-note/siyuan
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.