RepoPilot

nilbuild/developer-roadmap vs tanstack/query

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, developer-roadmap and query both show mixed maintenance signals. developer-roadmap was committed to today with 26+ active contributors, while query was committed to 3 days ago with 8+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

nilbuild/developer-roadmap

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

MixedDependency

no tests detected in the complete Git tree; license evidence incomplete

MixedFork & modify

no tests detected in the complete Git tree; license evidence incomplete

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
  • No tests detected in the complete Git tree
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 26+ active contributors
  • CI configured

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

tanstack/query

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 8 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 8 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

developer-roadmapquery
Stars367,45650,289
Last committoday3d ago
LicenseUnknownMIT
Open issues0174
Has testsNo
Has CI
Test coverage0%39%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeCC
Cycles08
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? nilbuild/developer-roadmap · tanstack/query

Ask AI about nilbuild/developer-roadmap vs tanstack/query

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.