nozbe/watermelondb vs paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, watermelondb and webgl-fluid-simulation both show mixed maintenance signals. watermelondb last saw a commit 10 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while webgl-fluid-simulation last saw a commit 1 year ago with 4+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nozbe/watermelondb →
Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 9mo ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 78% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 9mo ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation →
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| watermelondb | webgl-fluid-simulation | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 11,679 | 16,309 |
| Last commit | 10mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 299 | 76 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? nozbe/watermelondb · paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation
Ask AI about nozbe/watermelondb vs paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.