nuta/kerla vs ruvnet/ruview
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, kerla and ruview both show mixed maintenance signals. kerla last saw a commit 6 months ago with 7+ active contributors, while ruview was committed to 1 week ago with 2+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nuta/kerla
Evidence incomplete — review before adopting
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 79% of recent commits
- ⚠Could not verify license from the available repository evidence
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ruvnet/ruview
Mixed signals — read the receipts
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 71% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| kerla | ruview | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 3,464 | 92,443 |
| Last commit | 6mo ago | 13d ago |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open issues | 27 | 613 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 15% | 24% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 1 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? nuta/kerla · ruvnet/ruview
Ask AI about nuta/kerla vs ruvnet/ruview
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.