nuysoft/mock vs sindresorhus/get-port
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, mock and get-port both show mixed maintenance signals. mock last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors, while get-port last saw a commit 2 months ago with 21+ active contributors. mock is Other-licensed while get-port is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nuysoft/mock →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
sindresorhus/get-port →
OpenSSF Scorecard says this is unmaintained
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (2/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 8w ago
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mock | get-port | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,627 | 923 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 2mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 342 | 1 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 52% | 33% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? nuysoft/mock · sindresorhus/get-port
Ask AI about nuysoft/mock vs sindresorhus/get-port
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.