nuysoft/mock vs tumobi/nideshop-mini-program
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, mock and nideshop-mini-program both show mixed maintenance signals. mock last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors, while nideshop-mini-program last saw a commit 1 year ago with 1+ active contributor. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nuysoft/mock →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tumobi/nideshop-mini-program →
Slowing — last commit 12mo ago
no license — legally unclear; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 12mo ago…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 12mo ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 12mo ago
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mock | nideshop-mini-program | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,627 | 8,344 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1y ago |
| License | Other | — |
| Open issues | 342 | 3 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 52% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? nuysoft/mock · tumobi/nideshop-mini-program
Ask AI about nuysoft/mock vs tumobi/nideshop-mini-program
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.