ogaclejapan/smarttablayout vs tencent/tinker
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, smarttablayout and tinker both show mixed maintenance signals. smarttablayout last saw a commit 6 years ago with 13+ active contributors, while tinker last saw a commit 2 months ago with 4+ active contributors. smarttablayout is Apache-2.0-licensed while tinker is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ogaclejapan/smarttablayout →
Stale — last commit 6y ago
last commit was 6y ago; no tests detected…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 6y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 6y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 73% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
tencent/tinker →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other); no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 52% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| smarttablayout | tinker | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 7,077 | 17,628 |
| Last commit | 6y ago | 2mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 125 | 556 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 15% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ogaclejapan/smarttablayout · tencent/tinker
Ask AI about ogaclejapan/smarttablayout vs tencent/tinker
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.