ogham/dog vs spacedriveapp/spacedrive
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, dog and spacedrive both show mixed maintenance signals. dog last saw a commit 2 years ago with 17+ active contributors, while spacedrive last saw a commit 2 months ago with 2+ active contributors. dog is EUPL-1.2-licensed while spacedrive is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ogham/dog →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (EUPL-1.2); last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 82% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (EUPL-1.2) — review terms
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓EUPL-1.2 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
spacedriveapp/spacedrive →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| dog | spacedrive | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,650 | 37,965 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 2mo ago |
| License | EUPL-1.2 | Other |
| Open issues | 80 | 32 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 6% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ogham/dog · spacedriveapp/spacedrive
Ask AI about ogham/dog vs spacedriveapp/spacedrive
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.