onevcat/kingfisher vs slackhq/panmodal
onevcat/kingfisher shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, kingfisher shows healthier maintenance signals than panmodal. kingfisher rates Healthy overall while panmodal rates Mixed. kingfisher last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors, while panmodal last saw a commit 7 months ago with 20+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
onevcat/kingfisher →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
slackhq/panmodal →
Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 6mo ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 6mo ago
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 34% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| kingfisher | panmodal | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,322 | 3,786 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 7mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 173 | 97 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? onevcat/kingfisher · slackhq/panmodal
Ask AI about onevcat/kingfisher vs slackhq/panmodal
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.