onevcat/kingfisher vs socketio/socket.io-client-swift
onevcat/kingfisher shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, kingfisher shows healthier maintenance signals than socket.io-client-swift. kingfisher rates Healthy overall while socket.io-client-swift rates Mixed. kingfisher last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors, while socket.io-client-swift last saw a commit 1 year ago with 20+ active contributors. kingfisher is MIT-licensed while socket.io-client-swift is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
onevcat/kingfisher →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
socketio/socket.io-client-swift →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 74% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| kingfisher | socket.io-client-swift | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,322 | 5,297 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 173 | 260 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? onevcat/kingfisher · socketio/socket.io-client-swift
Ask AI about onevcat/kingfisher vs socketio/socket.io-client-swift
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.