onevcat/kingfisher vs stengo/deskpad
onevcat/kingfisher shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, kingfisher shows healthier maintenance signals than deskpad. kingfisher rates Healthy overall while deskpad rates Mixed. kingfisher last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors, while deskpad last saw a commit 3 months ago with 8+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
onevcat/kingfisher →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
stengo/deskpad →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 91% of recent commits; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%); add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| kingfisher | deskpad | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,322 | 7,709 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 3mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 173 | 38 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? onevcat/kingfisher · stengo/deskpad
Ask AI about onevcat/kingfisher vs stengo/deskpad
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.