onevcat/kingfisher vs supertone-inc/supertonic
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, kingfisher and supertonic both show healthy maintenance signals. kingfisher last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors, while supertonic last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
onevcat/kingfisher →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
supertone-inc/supertonic →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 81% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| kingfisher | supertonic | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,322 | 2,903 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 173 | 72 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | 6% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? onevcat/kingfisher · supertone-inc/supertonic
Ask AI about onevcat/kingfisher vs supertone-inc/supertonic
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.