openai/codex vs risingwavelabs/risingwave
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, codex and risingwave both show healthy maintenance signals. codex was committed to today with 33+ active contributors, while risingwave was committed to 1 week ago with 19+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
openai/codex
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓33+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 30% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
risingwavelabs/risingwave
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 18% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| codex | risingwave | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 124,784 | 9,308 |
| Last commit | today | 8d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 17,484 | 1,641 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 22% | 36% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? openai/codex · risingwavelabs/risingwave
Ask AI about openai/codex vs risingwavelabs/risingwave
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.