openemu/openemu vs quoid/userscripts
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, openemu and userscripts both show mixed maintenance signals. openemu last saw a commit 8 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while userscripts last saw a commit 1 month ago with 2+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
openemu/openemu →
Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
no license — legally unclear; no tests detected
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 7mo ago
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
quoid/userscripts →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 97% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| openemu | userscripts | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 17,537 | 4,492 |
| Last commit | 8mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 411 | 63 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 8% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? openemu/openemu · quoid/userscripts
Ask AI about openemu/openemu vs quoid/userscripts
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.