openfaas/faas vs sourcegraph/conc
sourcegraph/conc shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, conc shows healthier maintenance signals than faas. conc rates Healthy overall while faas rates Mixed. faas last saw a commit 2 months ago with 10+ active contributors, while conc last saw a commit 1 month ago with 14+ active contributors. faas is Other-licensed while conc is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
openfaas/faas →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 84% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
sourcegraph/conc →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 39% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| faas | conc | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 26,156 | 10,381 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 31 | 29 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 1% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? openfaas/faas · sourcegraph/conc
Ask AI about openfaas/faas vs sourcegraph/conc
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.