openzipkin/zipkin vs yuliskov/smarttube
openzipkin/zipkin shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, zipkin shows healthier maintenance signals than smarttube. zipkin rates Healthy overall while smarttube rates Mixed. zipkin last saw a commit 5 months ago with 11+ active contributors, while smarttube was committed to 1 week ago with 8+ active contributors. zipkin is Apache-2.0-licensed while smarttube is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
openzipkin/zipkin
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yuliskov/smarttube
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| zipkin | smarttube | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 17,434 | 32,681 |
| Last commit | 5mo ago | 9d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 168 | 698 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 28% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? openzipkin/zipkin · yuliskov/smarttube
Ask AI about openzipkin/zipkin vs yuliskov/smarttube
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.