ossu/computer-science vs sindresorhus/awesome
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, computer-science and awesome both show healthy maintenance signals. computer-science was committed to 1 day ago with 30+ active contributors, while awesome was committed to 3 days ago with 71+ active contributors. computer-science is MIT-licensed while awesome is CC0-1.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ossu/computer-science →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 25% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
sindresorhus/awesome →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓71+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 26% of recent commits)
- ✓CC0-1.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| computer-science | awesome | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 205,316 | 478,596 |
| Last commit | 1d ago | 3d ago |
| License | MIT | CC0-1.0 |
| Open issues | 23 | 87 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? ossu/computer-science · sindresorhus/awesome
Ask AI about ossu/computer-science vs sindresorhus/awesome
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.