ossu/computer-science vs sjmoran/sjmoran.github.io
ossu/computer-science shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, computer-science shows healthier maintenance signals than sjmoran.github.io. computer-science rates Healthy overall while sjmoran.github.io rates Mixed. computer-science was committed to 1 day ago with 30+ active contributors, while sjmoran.github.io was committed to today with 1+ active contributor. computer-science is MIT-licensed while sjmoran.github.io is CC0-1.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ossu/computer-science →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 25% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
sjmoran/sjmoran.github.io →
Solo project — review before adopting
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓CC0-1.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| computer-science | sjmoran.github.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 205,316 | 1 |
| Last commit | 1d ago | today |
| License | MIT | CC0-1.0 |
| Open issues | 23 | 0 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | — | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ossu/computer-science · sjmoran/sjmoran.github.io
Ask AI about ossu/computer-science vs sjmoran/sjmoran.github.io
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.