p0deje/maccy vs quick/nimble
quick/nimble shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, nimble shows healthier maintenance signals than maccy. nimble rates Healthy overall while maccy rates Mixed. maccy last saw a commit 4 months ago with 6+ active contributors, while nimble last saw a commit 1 month ago with 15+ active contributors. maccy is MIT-licensed while nimble is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
p0deje/maccy →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
quick/nimble →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 67% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| maccy | nimble | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,776 | 4,840 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 179 | 27 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? p0deje/maccy · quick/nimble
Ask AI about p0deje/maccy vs quick/nimble
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.