p0deje/maccy vs relatedcode/progresshud
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, maccy and progresshud both show mixed maintenance signals. maccy last saw a commit 4 months ago with 6+ active contributors, while progresshud last saw a commit 5 months ago with 7+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
p0deje/maccy →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
relatedcode/progresshud →
Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
top contributor handles 91% of recent commits; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%); add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| maccy | progresshud | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,776 | 2,966 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 5mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 179 | 12 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? p0deje/maccy · relatedcode/progresshud
Ask AI about p0deje/maccy vs relatedcode/progresshud
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.