p0deje/maccy vs x1a0he/adobe-downloader
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, maccy and adobe-downloader both show mixed maintenance signals. maccy was committed to 1 week ago with 26+ active contributors, while adobe-downloader last saw a commit 8 months ago with 1+ active contributor. maccy is MIT-licensed while adobe-downloader is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
p0deje/maccy
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
x1a0he/adobe-downloader
Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
CI evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| maccy | adobe-downloader | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21,493 | 3,054 |
| Last commit | 12d ago | 8mo ago |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 167 | 40 |
| Has tests | No | Unknown |
| Has CI | No | Unknown |
| Test coverage | — | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? p0deje/maccy · x1a0he/adobe-downloader
Ask AI about p0deje/maccy vs x1a0he/adobe-downloader
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.