RepoPilot

parcel-bundler/parcel vs vitejs/vite

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, parcel and vite both show healthy maintenance signals. parcel last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors, while vite was committed to 1 week ago with 28+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

parcel-bundler/parcel

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
  • Last commit 3d ago
  • 8 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

vitejs/vite

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Used by 3 trusted projects: nuxt/nuxt, withastro/astro, vitest-dev/vitest
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 28+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

parcelvite
Stars44,02082,724
Last commit1mo ago11d ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues601761
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage100%45%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeC
Cycles8
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? parcel-bundler/parcel · vitejs/vite

Ask AI about parcel-bundler/parcel vs vitejs/vite

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.