paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation vs remarkjs/remark
remarkjs/remark shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, remark shows healthier maintenance signals than webgl-fluid-simulation. remark rates Healthy overall while webgl-fluid-simulation rates Mixed. webgl-fluid-simulation last saw a commit 1 year ago with 4+ active contributors, while remark last saw a commit 4 months ago with 29+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation →
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
remarkjs/remark →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 65% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓29+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| webgl-fluid-simulation | remark | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 16,309 | 8,866 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 4mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 76 | 8 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 11% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation · remarkjs/remark
Ask AI about paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation vs remarkjs/remark
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.