paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation vs ruanyf/webpack-demos
paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, webgl-fluid-simulation shows stronger maintenance signals than webpack-demos. webgl-fluid-simulation rates Mixed overall while webpack-demos rates Concerns. webgl-fluid-simulation last saw a commit 1 year ago with 4+ active contributors, while webpack-demos last saw a commit 5 years ago with 23+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation →
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ruanyf/webpack-demos →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 5y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 5y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 5y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓23+ active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| webgl-fluid-simulation | webpack-demos | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 16,309 | 9,572 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 5y ago |
| License | MIT | — |
| Open issues | 76 | 0 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation · ruanyf/webpack-demos
Ask AI about paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation vs ruanyf/webpack-demos
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.