pdm-project/pdm vs pypa/hatch
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, pdm and hatch both show healthy maintenance signals. pdm was committed to 3 days ago with 29+ active contributors, while hatch was committed to 6 days ago with 34+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
pdm-project/pdm
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓29+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
pypa/hatch
Strong maintenance signals
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 1/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (1/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| pdm | hatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 8,674 | 7,235 |
| Last commit | 3d ago | 6d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 44 | 442 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 87% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? pdm-project/pdm · pypa/hatch
Ask AI about pdm-project/pdm vs pypa/hatch
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.