picocss/pico vs twbs/bootstrap
twbs/bootstrap shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, bootstrap shows healthier maintenance signals than pico. bootstrap rates Healthy overall while pico rates Mixed. pico last saw a commit 4 months ago with 17+ active contributors, while bootstrap was committed to 2 weeks ago with 10+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
picocss/pico
Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 78% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4mo ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
twbs/bootstrap
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Scorecard: known vulnerabilities detected (scored 0/10 by OpenSSF)
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 54% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| pico | bootstrap | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 16,827 | 174,677 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 18d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 124 | 227 |
| Has tests | No | ✓ |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 53% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? picocss/pico · twbs/bootstrap
Ask AI about picocss/pico vs twbs/bootstrap
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.