pingcap/tidb vs yugabyte/yugabyte-db
pingcap/tidb shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, tidb shows healthier maintenance signals than yugabyte-db. tidb rates Healthy overall while yugabyte-db rates Mixed. tidb was committed to 2 weeks ago with 34+ active contributors, while yugabyte-db was committed to 2 weeks ago with 39+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
pingcap/tidb
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 16% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
yugabyte/yugabyte-db
Evidence incomplete — review before adopting
license evidence incomplete
license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete
- ⚠3 moderate-severity advisories on direct dependencies
- ⚠Could not verify license from the available repository evidence
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓39+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 15% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| tidb | yugabyte-db | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 40,478 | 10,508 |
| Last commit | 14d ago | 15d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open issues | 6,866 | 8,355 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 48% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 6 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? pingcap/tidb · yugabyte/yugabyte-db
Ask AI about pingcap/tidb vs yugabyte/yugabyte-db
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.