pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher vs xuxueli/xxl-job
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, pojavlauncher and xxl-job both show mixed maintenance signals. pojavlauncher last saw a commit 11 months ago with 9+ active contributors, while xxl-job last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. pojavlauncher is LGPL-3.0-licensed while xxl-job is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher
Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
copyleft license (LGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 8mo ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 55% of recent commits
- ⚠LGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓LGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
xuxueli/xxl-job
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 95% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 6w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| pojavlauncher | xxl-job | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 8,921 | 30,516 |
| Last commit | 11mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 124 | 74 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 12% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher · xuxueli/xxl-job
Ask AI about pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher vs xuxueli/xxl-job
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.