RepoPilot

pomber/git-history vs vercel/next.js

vercel/next.js shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, next.js shows healthier maintenance signals than git-history. next.js rates Healthy overall while git-history rates Mixed. git-history last saw a commit 1 year ago with 7+ active contributors, while next.js was committed to today with 22+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

pomber/git-history

Mixed

Stale — last commit 2y ago

MixedDependency

last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 91% of recent commits

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
  • 7 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

vercel/next.js

Healthy

Healthy across the board

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; 2 cyclic import chains detected

  • In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
  • Last commit today
  • 22+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 15% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: bring "Token-Permissions" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

git-historynext.js
Stars13,687140,248
Last commit1y agotoday
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues944,153
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage9%4%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeA
Cycles2
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? pomber/git-history · vercel/next.js

Ask AI about pomber/git-history vs vercel/next.js

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.