pqpo/smartcropper vs yuliskov/smarttube
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, smartcropper and smarttube both show mixed maintenance signals. smartcropper last saw a commit 1 month ago with 11+ active contributors, while smarttube was committed to 1 week ago with 8+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
pqpo/smartcropper
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 64% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓11 active contributors
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
yuliskov/smarttube
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| smartcropper | smarttube | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,132 | 32,681 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 9d ago |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open issues | 38 | 698 |
| Has tests | No | ✓ |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 28% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? pqpo/smartcropper · yuliskov/smarttube
Ask AI about pqpo/smartcropper vs yuliskov/smarttube
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.